|
|
EVALUATION RESULTS |
Percentages based on the number of answers received (n=36). |
Part I - Content |
Strongly agree
1 - 2 |
3 |
Strongly disagree
4 - 5
|
| Content was described in the brochure |
86% |
10% |
3% |
| Workshop was appropriate for my job |
75% |
19% |
6% |
| Program was well paced within the allotted time |
82% |
9% |
9% |
| Material was presented in an organized manner |
91% |
0% |
9% |
| Presentations were clear and to the point |
85% |
12% |
3% |
| Presentations were given at the right level |
80% |
20%
|
0% |
| Material presented was interesting to me |
85% |
9% |
6% |
| |
|
|
|
| Part II - Participation Benefits |
|
|
|
| My thinking about these topics is more focussed |
78% |
22% |
0% |
| I learned about topics that were new to me |
90% |
0% |
10% |
| |
|
|
|
| Part III - Instructional Materials |
|
|
|
| Visuals |
88% |
6% |
6% |
| Acoustics |
89% |
8% |
3% |
| Handouts |
64% |
27% |
9% |
| Overall Average |
88% |
9% |
3% |
| Meeting place |
97% |
0% |
3% |
| Would you attend other Workshops hosted by the AVC Lobster Science Centre? |
| Yes: 70% |
No: 0% |
Depends on the topic: 30% |
| |
|
|
| How often should these Workshops be held? |
| Every 2 years: 3% |
Annually: 94% |
Twice each year: 3% |
| |
|
|
| Where should these Workshops be held? |
| Charlottetown: 52% |
Halifax 9% |
Moncton:6% |
| Rotate between Charlottetown & Halifax: 9% |
| Rotate between Charlottetown & Moncton: 6% |
| Rotate between Charlottetown, Moncton & Halifax: 12% |
| Other: Truro 3% |
Bonne Bay Station, NFLD 3% |
How could this Workshop have been improved?
- More tables - many groups of 2 had to be split up
- Better sound system
- At least 1 hour for the open forum
- It would be interesting to have fishermen and buyers from different areas present the biggest “current”
challenges facing the industry, especially questions about the lobster resource that could potentially be answered by existing science or future research
- Posters should be same level as talks
- There should be talks given by fishermen
- Distribution of reading materials several days before Workshop would have enhanced understanding and interest
- There should be a bit more time for keynote speakers
- There should be more industry presentations
- A little less technical
- Dynamically generate a list of points to act on, and appoint people/groups to address; action = results
- Should be a bigger screen; hard to see screen from back of room
- Should have a list of attendees in proceedings
- Evaluation form could include a place to suggest future topics and/or speakers
- Should have fruit at morning break
|
Other General Comments Received:
- Couldn’t hear the questions
- Very best
- Time moderation was well done
- Good range of topics presented
- Thoroughly enjoyed
- Great learning experience
- Well done
- Good topics
- Good presentations
|
|